On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 14:31 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:29:03PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 13:00 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > It looks like ImageMagick depends on fontconfig but didnt get bumped, > > > can you confirm? > > > > > > Also I wonder about ports that have optional dependencies on > > > fontconfig, we should probably bump them too to be safe (otherwise > > > people will have stale references to /usr/X11R6 in .la files again) > > > > Actually, ImageMagick should have been bumped, but was not. There are > > only two ports by my count that have fontconfig as an optional disabled > > dependency. I will recheck my script to see why some ports were not > > bumped. > > Thanks! I found the problem. My script didn't take DISTVERSION into account. I will send out a new, complete tarball shortly. Joe -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome_(_at_)_FreeBSD_(_dot_)_org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part