[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lock up in 6.2 (procs massively stuck in Giant)
- To: John Baldwin <jhb_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org>
- Subject: Re: lock up in 6.2 (procs massively stuck in Giant)
- From: pluknet <pluknet_(_at_)_gmail_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 10:40:33 +0400
- Cc: freebsd-stable_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5976o+Hz8aNEjTbd23LoWlyoFCnoN6L0+z08WU3U4PY=; b=Sgs8Gv5LuaTWL6JzGifjNS2VlYspRapuNJVDL/eyv14wcqc9pSettrm81IGUuAZrq7 jvjvDE/hVEO6h0xGeEyXH1bX30P3UCMo8WEpfDdL2yk03/6aKLxCPJHwb8a7S/ltIxNO Gd/NkETbxGISp8nQG2qHXeE4s1NuG7FGFsO+Q=
2009/5/13 pluknet <pluknet_(_at_)_gmail_(_dot_)_com>:
> 2009/5/13 John Baldwin <jhb_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org>:
>> On Tuesday 12 May 2009 4:59:19 pm pluknet wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> From just another box (not from the first two mentioned earlier)
>>> with a similar locking issue. If it would make sense, since there are
>>> possibly a bit different conditions.
>>> clock proc here is on swi4, I hope it's a non-important difference.
>>>
>>> 18 0 0 0 LL *Giant 0xd0a6b140 [swi4: clock sio]
>>> db> bt 18
>>
>> Ok, this is a known issue in 6.x. It is fixed in 6.4.
>>
Looking at the face of kern_timeout.c I suspect that was fixed in r181012.
Thanks again for the tips.
--
wbr,
pluknet
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"
Visit your host, monkey.org