Danny Braniss wrote: > hi danny > you are asking too many questions :-), but w/r to netapp: > same computer, 1gbE, NFS is about 50% slower than FC. > btw, iSCSI (still beta) is only slightly faster than NFS > (note NFS is UDP, iSCSI is TCP). Of course NFS can be TCP as well. And must be TCP for NFSv4. > as to reliability, the netapp is worth avery penny (actualy K$ :-), had only > one major breakdown in over 10 years. Same experiences here, with lots of NetApps. I would however not be happy running PostgreSQL over NFS. With FC/iSCSI, no problem. -- Dean C. Strik Eindhoven University of Technology dean_(_at_)_stack_(_dot_)_nl | dean_(_at_)_ipnet6_(_dot_)_org | http://www.ipnet6.org/ "This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." -- Wolfgang Pauli
Attachment:
pgpcIRtTh520X.pgp
Description: PGP signature