Re: Disenchanted with ZFS; alternatives?

[Wojciech Puchar <wojtek_(_at_)_wojtek_(_dot_)_tensor_(_dot_)_gdynia_(_dot_)_pl>]

> I have ZFS on my 7.1-PRERELEASE system, and while it does some spiffy things,
> in general I'm a bit underwhelmed.

UFS is excellent. your problem is that you like to have "lots of 
filesystems". why don't just make one or one per disk?

i have one per disk/mirror configuration everywhere except one place where 
i made separate filesystem for /var/spool/squid for some reasons.

tell me what's your needs and how many/what disks you have.

UFS is best-performer on real load, runs on almost no RAM, but uses more 
if available for caching.

_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"