Re: 6.0R todo list - hash sizes

[Chris <racerx_(_at_)_makeworld_(_dot_)_com>]

Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:53:58AM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote:
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>scottl@ removed:
>>    <td>Nullfs (and perhaps other filesystems) use an absurdly small
>>     hash size that causes significant performance penalties.</td>
>>
>>this item from 6.0R todo list. How was this solved? I didnt see any commits
>>to enlarge the hash values. Its still the same... why it was removed then?
> 
> 
> It was an incorrect suggestion on my part - it turns out this was not
> the cause of the performance penalties, and Jeff fixed them long ago.
> 
> Kris
> 

Somewhat off topic - what's the status of 6.0? The info on
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/schedule.html
Has not been updated in some time and we're still on Beta5

-- 
Best regards,
Chris

Things equal to nothing else are equal to each other.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"