[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is 'ath' going to be updated for 7.1-RELEASE ?
- To: Sam Leffler <sam_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org>
- Subject: Re: Is 'ath' going to be updated for 7.1-RELEASE ?
- From: "Alexandre \"Sunny\" Kovalenko" <gaijin_(_dot_)_k_(_at_)_gmail_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:41:23 -0400
- Cc: Jack Twilley <jmt_(_at_)_twilley_(_dot_)_org>, Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल <wahjava_(_dot_)_ml_(_at_)_gmail_(_dot_)_com>, freebsd-mobile_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Jt2GTeaeuhiQC6Bi87NHCLLzkbz7SkGhgarfkmJnu2s=; b=aKxOQyFa/DfPrIaaM6uytTbrS5uq60KJFoHaLClUKSDjlxv51CV5Kb5w9tLxgG7btl tFfZSZ8uNKjjBVBSVzLk7IVXbVtgoi8exUa0yfdN4lWePs7p6YjOcStqHHqJpm+3niqh ZS92ebCKgN8AW6vOPWj4fA2jaHegz07+N+6eU=
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 12:39 -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> Jack Twilley wrote:
> > Sam Leffler wrote:
> >> Jack Twilley wrote:
> >>> Sam Leffler wrote:
> >>>> Ashish Shukla à ¤†à ¤¶à ¥€à ¤·
> >>>> à ¤¶à ¥Âà ¤•à ¥Âà ¤² wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Just came across the release schedule of 7.1-RELEASE. I'm
> >>>>> wondering if
> >>>>> new version of 'ath' driver (for Athereos Wireless chipsets) is going
> >>>>> to be included or not ? If yes, I'll be glad to try the betas :).
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> Not sure what "new version" means. I'm unlikely to have any time to
> >>>> look at existing ath problems in RELENG_7 before the release.
> >>> I am hoping against hope it means "whatever it takes to make the Asus
> >>> Eee PC work without having to follow the steps on the EeeBSD page". I
> >>> rebuilt kernel and world today and forgot *again* to do the madwifi
> >>> dance. It's getting old.
> >>
> >> The required hal is not even committed to HEAD yet; there's no way it's
> >> going to get into RELENG_7 w/o significant testing. As to "getting old"
> >> others are free to pitch in to make things happen. I have very little
> >> time for freebsd right now and what time I do have is focused on higher
> >> priority issues.
> >
> > All I can offer is the ability to test. I do not have the skill
> > necessary to fix this or I would have written a fix and asked for it
> > to be committed. It is amazingly frustrating to know that there is a
> > workaround and to see that others consider this a low priority issue.
> >
> > If not you, then who should I ask about committing the new HAL to HEAD
> > and helping me check out whatever I need to check out to test the fix
> > so the rest of us can have wireless Ethernet working out of the box?
>
> I have repeatedly asked for testing of the 0.10.5.6 hal sitting in
> http://www.freebsd.org/~sam on HEAD but not gotten enough results to
> commit to HEAD.
Since I am running RELENG_7 with 0.10.5.6 HAL anyway (to have ath and
powerd happily coexisting) are there any specific scenarios, that you'd
like tested?
--
Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko (Олександр Коваленко)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-mobile_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-mobile-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"
Visit your host, monkey.org