[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ipfw, pipes, queues, weights and managing an Internet connection
- To: freebsd-ipfw_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: ipfw, pipes, queues, weights and managing an Internet connection
- From: "Lubomir Georgiev" <0shady0recs0_(_at_)_gmail_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:36:43 +0200
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=kiSPUDbLox3fTqQnlU63F1/SGRn8fjiyav/wkuIOd3JaNsQ/toW2yVyvvBqmMC2dU6CA7qVdqzdnSV+ivu9mLtR4Ro7jdW/Qy3m8gNpR91SbuZyVvb3txH3jq7T93KGh2UrOHH2fnu/079EqL9aSedCfaDorP/dTpCSG+oX+QFQ=
OK, so that answers my question.... I'm just stupid :D
Just one question - you're saying that it is possible to shape /delay,
drop etc./ the packets so quickly so that when a pipe is fully utilized
someone hits a queue with a higher weight /for example port 80 would be
prioritized over p2p traffic/ it would be like as if the pipe was not used
at all?
--
mEsS wItH tHe bEsT
dIE liKe tHe rESt
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ipfw_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"
- Prev by Date:
ipfw, pipes, queues, weights and managing an Internet connection
- Next by Date:
Re: ipfw, pipes, queues, weights and managing an Internet connection
- Previous by thread:
Re: ipfw, pipes, queues, weights and managing an Internet connection
- Next by thread:
Re: ipfw, pipes, queues, weights and managing an Internet connection
- Index(es):
Visit your host, monkey.org