[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: problem simulating a LFN
- To: freebsd-ipfw_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: problem simulating a LFN
- From: Looza <elias_nogueira_(_at_)_hotmail_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:41:56 -0800 (PST)
About the offloading, it might be just that but I not sure and I don't have
time to explore this situation. I'm using 2 SMC9452TX and 1 SMC9452TX-1.
The delay issue was because of the TCP buffers, I had configured them but
the changes weren't permanent.
infofarmer wrote:
>
> On 12/18/06, Looza <elias_nogueira_(_at_)_hotmail_(_dot_)_com> wrote:
>> My first question is if anyone knows off some way to
>> get the processing out of the CPU so that I can achieve
>> gigabit speeds without ?
>
> Like you already noticed, better NICs help. BTW, which
> ones do you have? See drivers' manpages for info about
> hardware offloading. Also, have a look at polling(4), it
> might (or might not) help.
>
>> My second question is if there is a way of setting the
>> ipfw delay option so that it does not alter the throughput?
>
> You'll have to read ipfw(8) for that. In short, you might
> have to increase the queue size so that it can hold 100ms
> worth of traffic.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ipfw_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/problem-simulating-a-LFN-tf2837638.html#a7955491
Sent from the freebsd-ipfw mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ipfw_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"
Visit your host, monkey.org