Re: New option for newfs(3) to make life with GEOM easier

["Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk_(_at_)_phk_(_dot_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_dk>]

In message <20070901074803_(_dot_)_GM85633_(_at_)_comp_(_dot_)_chem_(_dot_)_msu_(_dot_)_su>, Yar Tikhiy writes:
>Hi all,
>
>With some geom(4) modules saving their metadata in the last sectors
>of block devices such as disks and partitions, 

1.  If those geom modules do not reduce their providers to prevent
this metadata from being overwritten, they are buggy.

2.  Why not simply allow the -s argument to newfs to be negative so
    "-s -200" means "reserve 200 sectors" ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk_(_at_)_FreeBSD_(_dot_)_ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-fs_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"