[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gmirror disks vs partitions
- To: "Matthew X. Economou" <xenophon_(_at_)_irtnog_(_dot_)_org>
- Subject: Re: gmirror disks vs partitions
- From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer_(_at_)_FreeBSD_(_dot_)_org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:03:26 +0300
- Cc: stable_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org, fs_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org
On 1/17/07, Matthew X. Economou <xenophon_(_at_)_irtnog_(_dot_)_org> wrote:
> Apart from potentially avoiding a whole disk from being copied
> during a resync after a crash, are there any other advantages to
> using partition level mirroring instead of drive level mirroring?
Joe,
Partition-level software RAID plus LVM is how the following Slashdot
poster manages extendable (and inequally sized disk) arrays on Linux:
http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=169386&cid=14117414
[...after reading the slashdotter's piece of wisdom...]
Yes, but that's the kind of functionality I have always
expected to be present in software raid solutions. I
hope I'll live to see this implemented in geom.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-fs_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe_(_at_)_freebsd_(_dot_)_org"
Visit your host, monkey.org